
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
NEUESTE BEITRÄGE
- 1
Lilly becomes first healthcare firm to join trillion-dollar club, Wall Street reacts21.11.2025 - 2
Step by step instructions to Keep up with the Life span of Your Kona SUV's Battery Duration17.10.2023 - 3
I'm a woman who's into weightlifting. Was I man enough for the creatine-packed 'Man Cereal'?26.12.2025 - 4
The Longest Underwater Tunnel Connecting Germany and Denmark14.01.2026 - 5
The Job of Attorneys: It is Important to Comprehend When Legitimate Help30.06.2023
Ähnliche Artikel
How to watch 'Tell Me Lies' Season 3: Episode release times, streaming info and more13.01.2026
What you need to know about Trump accounts as Michael and Susan Dell donate $6 billion to the new early childhood investment program03.12.2025
Vaccine makers raise concerns over US panel's shift away from hepatitis B shots for newborns05.12.2025
Figure out How to Remain Persuaded During Your Internet based Degree Program17.10.2023
RFK Jr. guts the US childhood vaccine schedule despite its decades-long safety record06.01.2026
Shredded cheese sold in dozens of states recalled due to potential for metal fragment contamination03.12.2025
Why the chemtrail conspiracy theory lingers and grows – and why Tucker Carlson is talking about it14.11.2025
The Response to Fake General Knowledge: Investigating the Eventual fate of artificial intelligence07.07.2023
Surprise! Saturn's huge moon Titan may not have a buried ocean after all17.12.2025
Key Training: Picking a Significant for Monetary Achievement05.06.2024














